«Ο ψεύτης και ο κλέφτης τον πρώτο χρόνο χαίρονται» λέει μια παροιμία. Ήρθε λοιπόν η ώρα να απομυθοποιηθεί ο **κρυφοπαγανιστής** και μυθοπλάστης k. Καλόπουλος. Ο ψευδοεπιστημονισμός του, είναι πλέον έκθετος σε κάθε λογικό άνθρωπο. Ο Ανώνυμος Απολογητής, του αφιέρωσε μία εκτενή απάντηση, απαντώντας όχι μόνο στην επιστολή του, όπου ο Καλόπουλος είχε ήδη ΚΟΥΤΣΟΥΡΕΨΕΙ τη δική του για τη δημιουργία εντυπώσεων, αλλά και σε πλήθος άλλων μυθευμάτων και ΕΞΑΠΑΤΗΣΕΩΝ των αφελών, στις οποίες προέβη ο Καλόπουλος μέσα από άρθρα του στο Παγανιστικό περιοδικό Ιχώρ.

Τώρα μπορεί ο καθένας να δει την απάτη και το δόλο που κρύβεται στα κείμενα των παγανιστών σαν τον ψευτοεπιστήμονα Καλόπουλο, όπως ΑΠΟΚΑΛΥΠΤΕΤΑΙ από τον Ανώνυμο Απολογητή, στη νέα θεματική ενότητα της εξαιρετικής ιστοσελίδας του. Την ενότητα αυτή, την αφιερωμένη εξ ολοκλήρου στον μυθοπλάστη και ανορθολογιστή Καλόπουλο, μπορείτε να την βρείτε στην παραπάνω διεύθυνση .

Εκεί θα δείτε πώς ο Καλόπουλος διαστρέφει τα κείμενα των αγίων Πατέρων, της Αγίας Γραφής, των αρχαίων φιλοσόφων και τις έννοιες των λέξεων. Πώς εξοραϊζει τα παγανιστικά μυθεύματα ενώ θέλει να θεωρείται ορθολογιστής, ενώ με διαστροφές προσπαθεί να πείσει ότι οι αληθινές ιστορίες της Αγίας Γραφής είναι μύθοι. Παρατηρήστε την ιστορική του άγνοια (αν όχι την ηθελημένη ιστορική διαστρέβλωση). Δείτε το ξεσκέπασμα ενός ψευτο - ορθολογιστή, όχι μόνο χάριν πληροφόρησης, αλλά και χάριν της αλήθειας.

Επειδή η διαστροφή της αλήθειας πρέπει ΝΑ ΕΚΤΙΘΕΤΑΙ.

- Η Αγάπη Tου - Περιοδικά - Βιβλία30/12/2003, 13:44:19

Απόσπασμα απο το βιβλίο: "Οι Γκουρού , ο Νέος και ο Γεροντας Παϊσιος", Εκδόσεις παναγόπουλος

- Η Αγάπη Tου - Περιοδικά - Βιβλία30/12/2003, 13:37:40

Η Αγάπη Tου

· «ότι ο Θεός αγάπη εστί» (Α Ιω. 4, 8 )
· «…ότι η αγάπη του Θεού εκκέχυται εν ταις καρδίαις ημών δια Πνεύματος Αγίου του δοθέντος ημίν» (Ρμ. 5, 5)
· «η τελεία αγάπη έξω βάλλει τον φόβον» (Α Ιω. 4, 18 )
· «γνώναι τε την υπερβάλλουσαν της γνώσεως αγάπην του Χριστού» (Εφ. 3 ,19)
· «Ω Θεοποιός αγάπη, Θεός ούσα» (Αγ. Συμεών ο νέος θεολόγος, υμν. 5, 24)

Δεν υπήρχε αγάπη σ’ αυτόν τον κόσμο. Κανείς δεν με είχε αγαπήσει αληθινά για αυτό που είμαι. Όλοι με «αγαπούσαν» για κάποιο λόγο. Οι κοπέλες μας «αγαπούσαν», αν είχαμε ωραίο πρόσωπο, σώμα, μάτια. Αν όμως πάθαινα ένα ατύχημα και έχανα το πόδι μου ή παραμορφωνόταν το πρόσωπό μου, «εγώ» πάλι δεν θα ήμουν το ίδιο πρόσωπο; Κι όμως, καμιά δεν θα έμενε δίπλα μου. Καμιά δεν με αγαπούσε αληθινά. Καμιά δεν αγαπούσε το βαθύτερο πυρήνα της ύπαρξής μου, τον εαυτό μου. Ούτε καν σχετιζόταν μαζί του. Σχετιζόταν μόνο με την επιφάνεια, το σώμα.
Οι φίλοι μου γιατί με αγαπούσαν; Για το μυαλό; τις ιδέες; για τη μαγκιά; για τις γνώσεις; Μα αν δεν είχα πάει στο Πανεπιστήμιο, πάλι δε θα ήμουν ο ίδιος, το ίδιο πρόσωπο; Αν χτυπούσα στο κεφάλι και γινόμουν λίγο βαρύς στο νου, ο βαθύτερος πυρήνας μου, η ψυχή μου, δε θα ήταν πάλι ο ίδιος; Ποιος θα με αγαπούσε τότε; Κανείς.
Ακόμα και η αγάπη των γονιών μου δεν ήταν καθαρή. Τη σκίαζαν κάποιες προσδοκίες. Κάποια επιθυμία ανταπόδοσης στο μέλλον. Εκτός από τη φυσική αγάπη με αγαπούσαν και για κάποιους λόγους. Γιατί ήμουν έξυπνος, γιατί ήμουν καλός μαθητής, γιατί θα τους φρόντιζα στα γεράματα.
Μα δεν υπήρχε κανείς να με αγαπάει για αυτό που ήμουν; Άδολα, χωρίς συμφέρον, χωρίς να περιμένει κάποια ανταπόδοση; Δεν είχε σημασία αν ήμουν έξυπνος ή χαζός, όμορφος ή άσχημος, καλός ή κακός. Υπήρχα εγώ, πίσω και πέρα από όλα αυτά τα επιφανειακά πράγματα, ο αληθινός εαυτός μου. Ήθελα κάποιος να με αγαπήσει έτσι, χωρίς λόγο, μόνο γιατί υπήρχα. Να αγαπήσει το βαθύτερο πυρήνα της ύπαρξής μου και όχι τα κοινωνικά φτιασιδώματα.
Άρχισα, λοιπόν, να πετάω από πάνω μου όλα αυτά τα επίκτητα στολίδια. Πρώτα τα ρούχα. Άρχισα να ντύνομαι κακόγουστα, άσχημα. Γρήγορα απογοητεύθηκαν, αρκετοί θύμωσαν απ’ αυτήν την αλλαγή και έφυγαν ακόμα πιο μακριά μου.

Με έκπληξη διαπίστωσα πόσο ψεύτικες και επιφανειακές ήταν οι σχέσεις με τους γύρω μου. Ακόμα και οι πιο στενοί μου φίλοι άρχισαν να «βαραίνουν». Ήμουν όμως αποφασισμένος να φτάσω μέχρι το τέλος. Θα πετούσα από πάνω μου, θα απελευθερωνόμουν από κάθε τι το επιφανειακό, το ψεύτικο. Θα ξεγύμνωνα τελείως τον εαυτό μου, μέχρι να μείνει σκέτος, καθαρή ύπαρξη.

Τότε μόνο θα γνώριζα ποιος με είχε αντιληφθεί βαθειά και πραγματικά. Αυτός που θα εξακολουθούσε να μένει δίπλα μου, γι’ αυτό που ήμουν, μόνο για αυτό.

…Δεν έμεινε κανείς… Βρέθηκα ολομόναχος… Ουσιαστικά μόνος. Κανείς δεν με ακολούθησε στο βάθος. Βρήκα το κέντρο της ύπαρξής μου, τον πυρήνα του εαυτού μου, αλλά… είχα μείνει μόνος. Μου ήταν εύκολο να ξαναγυρίσω στη ζωή της επιφάνειας. Γνώριζα να παίζω αυτούς τους ρόλους από μικρό παιδί. Μπορούσα να ξαναπαίξω το ρόλο του εραστή, του φίλου, του γιου. Δεν ήθελα όμως. Τώρα που βρήκα τον πυρήνα του εαυτού μου, ήθελα να ασχοληθώ με τον εαυτό μου. Ήθελα να γνωρίσω τον εαυτό μου. Η καταστροφή της ψεύτικης συνείδησης για τον εαυτό μου μου προξενούσε πόνο. Ο πόνος κατέστρεφε το ψεύτικο ωραιοποιημένο είδωλο που είχα πλάσει για τον εαυτό μου.

Ο πόνος ήταν ένα κοφτερό νυστέρι. Έκοβε βαθειά και ξεχώριζε τις σάρκες από τα κόκαλα. Το ψεύτικο από το αληθινό. Υπήρχε πολύ ψέμα μέσα μου που έπρεπε να πεταχτεί έξω. Ο χειρουργός ήταν αποφασισμένος. Η εγχείρηση έπρεπε να γίνει. Αλλιώς δεν υπήρχε σωτηρία, δρόμος για την αλήθεια. Ο πόνος ήταν η φωτιά που καιγόντουσαν τα ψέματα.

Εκείνη την εποχή πέρασα από ένα μεγάλο πόνο. Πονούσα πολύ και βαθιά. Ένιωθα τα κόκαλά μου να συντρίβονται. Η ψυχή μου είχε μείνει άφωνη και τρομοκρατημένη. Ένιωθα το μυαλό μου έτοιμο να σκάσει σε χίλια κομματάκια. Μόλις και μετά βίας συγκρατούσα τα λογικά μου. Δεν μπορούσα να κοιμηθώ… Φοβόμουν να κοιμηθώ… Μόλις με έπιανε για λίγο ο ύπνος και χαλάρωνε η επαγρύπνηση του λογικού πάνω στο συναίσθημα, η ψυχή μου, μια τεράστια βαθειά κόκκινη πληγή, ανέβλυζε απότομα ένα ποτάμι οδυνηρού πόνου, που απειλούσε να διαλύσει την ύπαρξή μου ολοκληρωτικά. Ξυπνούσα αλαφιασμένος προσπαθώντας να ελέγξω τον τρομακτικό πόνο. Η λογική μου, μια εύθραυστη κλωστή, έτοιμη να σπάσει σε χίλια κομμάτια, συγκρατούσε το νου μου. Φοβόμουν ότι όπου να ‘ναι θα τρελαθώ. Δεν θα άντεχα στον πόνο.

Με ένταση και επιμονή προσπαθούσα να ερμηνεύσω αυτόν τον πόνο. Προσπαθούσα να βρω την αιτία αυτού του πόνου. Ήταν η έλλειψη αγάπης; Η απουσία της αλήθειας; Η μάταιη ζωή μου; Αναζητούσα με μεγάλο πόθο και αγωνία την απάντηση. Υπάρχει αληθινή αγάπη σ’ αυτόν τον κόσμο; Μήπως ζητούσα το αδύνατο, το άπιαστο;

Πήγα στον π. Παΐσιο και του άνοιξα τα βάθη της καρδιάς μου. Με αγωνία περίμενα απάντηση. Σοβαρά μου μίλησε.
«Ο άνθρωπος αξίζει να αγαπηθεί μόνο, γιατί είναι εικόνα Θεού. Δεν έχει σημασία ούτε καν αν είναι καλός ή κακός, ενάρετος ή αμαρτωλός. Ο άνθρωπος αξίζει να αγαπηθεί γι’ αυτό που είναι. Ο Χριστός αγάπησε και θυσιάστηκε για ανθρώπους αμαρτωλούς, διεστραμμένους . «Ουκ ήλθα δικαίους, αλλά αμαρτωλούς καλέσαι εις μετάνοιαν ». Έτσι πρέπει να τους αγαπάμε όλους αδιάκριτα. Όπως ο ήλιος ανατέλλει για όλους, έξυπνους και χαζούς, αγαθούς και πονηρούς, όμορφους και άσχημους, έτσι και η αγάπη μας πρέπει να είναι σαν την αγάπη του Θεού, που μοιάζει με τον ήλιο και απευθύνεται αδιακρίτως σε όλα πλάσματά Του.»
Παρηγορήθηκα. Τουλάχιστον κάποιος συμφωνούσε μαζί μου. Κάποιος με κατάλαβε. Τι παρηγοριά!… Αυτός ο κάποιος ήταν ο π. Παΐσιος.

Γύρισα σπίτι μου. Ο πόνος… πόνος όμως!! Καμιά φορά δεν άντεχα και ξυπνούσα βουβά τη νύκτα με κλάματα. «Θεέ μου, Θεέ μου». Μια σιωπηλή κραυγή έβγαινε από τα σωθικά μου. Αυτό μόνο. «Θεέ μου, Θεέ μου». Χτυπούσα το κεφάλι μου στο μαξιλάρι. Μια βαθειά μετάνοια. Όλα τα είχα κάνει τόσο λάθος… τόσο στραβά. Τα φοβερά αυτά βράδια πάλευα απεγνωσμένα για την ζωή μου ολάκερη.

Συνέβη ένα τέτοιο βράδυ. Ήμουν μόνος στο διαμέρισμα. Προσευχόμουν, όταν ένιωσα να με πλησιάζει. Αόρατο, αλλά τόσο πολύ παρόν. Άυλο, άλλα παντοδύναμο. Απλησίαστο, άπιαστο, αλλά τόσο κοντινό.
Με ακούμπησε, όχι επιφανειακά, αλλά στο βάθος μου. Μέχρι εκεί που τελειώνει η ύπαρξή μου. Με γέμισε, με πλημμύρισε. Ενώθηκε μαζί μου τόσο στενά, που γίναμε ένα. Τίποτα δεν μπορεί να ενωθεί τόσο πολύ με κάτι άλλο. Με μέθυσε. Έγινα σαν φωτιά. Το σώμα μου έκαιγε. Ήθελα να είμαι τελείως ανοικτός. Καμιά γωνιά της ψυχής μου να μην είναι κρυφή. Όσο άσχημη και βρώμικη να ήταν. Ήθελα όλα να είναι γνωστά και φανερά. Ήθελα και ομολογούσα και έδειχνα όλα τα στραβά και βρώμικα, όλες τις κακίες μου. …Ποθούσα βαθειά να επισκεφτεί την κάθε γωνιά της ψυχής μου… …Από την άλλη μεριά ένιωθα τόσο ανάξιος… τόσο αταίριαστος να υπάρχω μαζί Του.. Έπεσα με το πρόσωπο στο πάτωμα… Ήθελα να χωθώ μέσα στο τσιμέντο.

Ήταν μια τεράστια, άπειρη Αγάπη. Ερχόταν από παντού. Από το άπειρο. Πληρούσε το σύμπαν. Αυτή συγκρατούσε το σύμπαν, τα πάντα. Ήταν η συνεκτική δύναμη του σύμπαντος. Το σύμπαν έπαιρνε τη δύναμη της ύπαρξής του απ’ Αυτήν την Αγάπη. Το σύμπαν συνέχιζε να υπάρχει εξ αιτίας Της.

Ήθελα να πάψω να ζω. Ήμουν γεμάτος κακία… τελείως ανάξιος να υπάρχω και να ενωθώ μαζί Της. Ήμουν ακίνητος. Αυτή με πλησίαζε. Ήταν μια Αγάπη που πήγαζε απ’ Αυτόν που υπήρχε πάντα και κατευθυνόταν προς τα πάντα, διαπερνούσε τα πάντα.

Αυτή η αγάπη απαντιέται μόνο με ίδια αγάπη. Τίποτα λιγότερο. Θα έπρεπε από φιλότιμο να θελήσουμε, να τολμήσουμε να αγαπήσουμε με τον ίδιο τρόπο. Μόνο αυτό είναι αντάξιό Της.

Με άφηνε, επειδή με αγαπούσε, να Τον πλησιάσω και με καθάριζε και με γιάτρευε· όλους τους πόνους, όλες τις πληγές, βαθειά και τέλεια.
Με τραβούσε απαλά, σταθερά, σίγουρα, από το σκοτάδι στο φως., από την βρωμιά στην καθαρότητα, από την ανυπαρξία στην ύπαρξη. Μου χάριζε πιο έντονη, πιο αληθινή, πιο ζωντανή ύπαρξη. Όχι γιατί με είχε ανάγκη, αλλά γιατί ήταν αγάπη.

Δεν αγαπούσε μόνο… Ήταν η Αγάπη… Μεγάλη διαφορά.

Πάλι το ίδιο αίσθημα αδυναμίας να εκφράσω τα ανέκφραστα. Πόσο χρόνο κράτησε; Δε γνωρίζω. Νύχτα άρχισε, νύχτα τελείωσε. Τι επίδραση είχε πάνω μου; Γιάτρεψε τον πόνο, στερέωσε το νου μου, εξαφάνισε τον κίνδυνο, απάντησε στις ερωτήσεις μου. Έμαθα όχι μόνο εκείνα που ρωτούσα, αλλά πολύ περισσότερα. Πάρα πολύ περισσότερα. Μου χάρισε γνώση βιωματική, σίγουρη, βεβαία, ασφαλή. Δε μπορεί κανείς να μου την αφαιρέσει. Η επίδρασή της συνεχίζεται μέχρι σήμερα.

Γνωρίζω πια ότι η ανθρώπινη φύση, ο καθένας από μας, με την συνέργια του Θεού, έχει την δυνατότητα να γεννήσει μέσα στην καρδιά του μια τέτοια αγάπη. Αν το κάνει, μεταβάλλεται οντολογικά, θεώνεται!!
Λίγοι το κάνουν, όλοι μπορούν. Όμως εμείς οι πολλοί τεμπελιάζουμε, φοβόμαστε, ασχολούμαστε με ασήμαντα πράγματα. Είμαστε ένοχοι γι’ αυτή τη στάση.

Αυτή είναι η «πνευματική αγάπη » που γεννάει το Άγιο Πνεύμα μέσα στην ψυχή του ανθρώπου. Αυτή κάνει τον άνθρωπο «Θείας φύσεως κοινωνόν».

Αυτή η αγάπη είναι πολύ, πάρα πολύ ανώτερη από οποιαδήποτε αγάπη ανθρώπινη. Η μητρική αγάπη είναι ασήμαντη μπροστά Της. Ο π. Παΐσιος είχε αυτήν την αγάπη. Γι’ αυτό μάζευε τους ανθρώπους γύρω του.
Αυτή η αγάπη είναι παντοδύναμη. Τίποτα δεν μπορεί να της αντισταθεί. Αυτή η αγάπη νικάει τον θάνατο. Τους νόμους της φύσης. Αυτή η αγάπη είναι ο «νομοθέτης» του σύμπαντος. Αυτή η αγάπη είναι το μυστήριο του σύμπαντος: «ότι ο Θεός αγάπη εστί».

Ο π. Παΐσιος είχε τέτοια αγάπη μέσα του για όλους τους ανθρώπους, για όλα τα πλάσματα, για όλη την κτίση. Έτσι με αγαπούσε και μένα. Θέλησε και μου το έδειξε. Αυτή του η αγάπη έγινε το στήριγμα της ζωής μου. Μέχρι να πεθάνω σ’ αυτήν την αγάπη θα ακουμπώ. Σ’ αυτή την αγάπη ακουμπούσα όταν ήμουν στην Ινδία. Τι να φοβηθεί ο άνθρωπος, όταν υπάρχει κάποιος που τον αγαπά μ’ αυτόν τον τρόπο; Μόνο τον εαυτό του, ίσως.

Καμιά φορά ο γέροντας συνήθιζε να «καταριέται» γελώντας: «Να σας κάψει ο Θεός με την Αγάπη Του» έλεγε. Πολλοί το εννοούσαν μεταφορικά. Εγώ γνώριζα ότι κυριολεκτούσε απόλυτα και κάτι παραπάνω. Γνωρίζω ότι η προσευχή του μου χάρισε και αυτή την εμπειρία.
Κι αν απέσπασα αυτή την εμπειρία από το έλεος του Θεού δι’ ευχών του γέροντα Παϊσίου, επειδή την είχα ανάγκη, για να διατηρηθώ στη ζωή, υπήρχαν, υπάρχουν και θα υπάρχουν άνθρωποι, που κατέκτησαν αυτή την ηψηλότατη κορυφή των κορυφών με προσωπικούς αγώνες, με την προσωπική τους αξία.

Ένας τέτοιος είναι ο Άγιος Συμεών, ο νέος Θεολόγος. Μοναχός. Έζησε στην Κωνσταντινούπολη (949-1022 μ.Χ.) Σπάνια Άγιοι μιλούν τόσο φανερά, τόσο ανοικτά για τις «εν Χριστώ» εμπειρίες τους. Θερμά προτρέπω κάθε ενδιαφερόμενο να μελετήσει τα «Άπαντά» του.
Να, πως περιγράφει ο Άγιος μια εμπειρία του.

ΚΕΙΜΕΝΟ -
ΜΕΤΑΦΡΑΣΗ

«Η Αγάπη, αίφνης όλη πάλιν
εν εμοί γνωστώς ευρέθη
εν καρδία μου τε μέσον
ως φωστήρ, ως δίσκος όντως
του ηλίου καθωράθη…

Μετ:
Η Αγάπη ξαφνικά ξαναεμφανίστηκε ολόκληρη
μέσα μου με τρόπο καταληπτό,
και μέσα στην καρδιά μου
φανερώθηκε σαν φωστήρας,
σαν δίσκος – πραγματικά – του ήλιου.
………………….
Έξω δε κτισμάτων ούσα
Έστιν αυ και μετά πάντων,
έστι πυρ, εστί και αίγλη,
γίνεται φωτός νεφέλη…

Μετ:
Η Αγάπη είναι έξω από όλα τα κτίσματα
και πάλι είναι μαζί με όλα,
είναι φωτιά, είναι και λάμψη
γίνεται σύννεφο φωτός.
………………….
Απεγύμνωσε τον νου μου
και αισθήσεως χιτώνα
νοερώς ενέδυσέ με,
ορατών δ’ εχώρισέ με
και συνήκεν αοράτοις
και τον άκτιστον οράν με
εχαρίσατο και χαίρειν…

Μετ:
Η Αγάπη απογύμνωσε το νου μου
και με έντυσε με το χιτώνα
της νοερής αίσθησης,
με χώρισε από τα ορατά
και με συνέδεσα με τα αόρατα,
και μου χάρισε να βλέπω τον Άκτιστο
και να χαίρομαι.
………………….

Και ηνώθην τω ακτίστω,
τω αφθάρτω, τω ανάρχω
τω τοις πάσιν αοράτω·
Τούτο γαρ αγάπη πέλεις…»

Μετ:
και ενώθηκα με τον Άκτιστο,
τον Άφθαρτο, τον Άναρχο,
τον Αόρατο σε όλους·
Γιατί αυτό είναι η Αγάπη.

«Ω Θεοποιός αγάπη, Θεός ούσα»
«ότι ο Θεός αγάπη εστί»

- H επιστήμη της Ορθόδοξης Ψυχοθεραπείας - ΝΕΑ - Μέσα από το Διεθνές Internet31/12/2003, 15:56:34

Ποιός είμαι:
----------------

Ονομάζομαι Δρίτσας Θωμάς
Ορίστε: http://server.hellug.gr/LUGistics/el/pub/MEMB_show.php3?memberID=103

Ορίστε και φωτο μου:http://www.hellug.gr/photos/pita2000/picture-002.html

Είμαι ο τύπος με την μεγάλη μύτη και το μουσάκι, στα αριστερά του παιδιού με την κόκκινη μπλούζα...

O.K?

Αυτά για όσους "Κινδυνολογούν", ανευθυνα..

- H επιστήμη της Ορθόδοξης Ψυχοθεραπείας - ΝΕΑ - Μέσα από το Διεθνές Internet31/12/2003, 15:51:30

quote:

Η πιθανότητες είναι να είσαι ο ίδιος πάντως, όπως το βλέπω... Η τακτική που ακολουθείς σήμερα είναι κάπως καλύτερη - φανερώνει έναν έξυπνο άνθρωπο και προσαρμοστικό, όμως επιδέχεται μεγάλης βελτίωσης ακόμη εάν θέλεις να "ευδοκιμήσεις" στον χώρο αυτό. Ούτως ή άλλως οι IPs σου είναι όλες φυλαγμένες, δείχνουν προς τον ίδιον Provider και είναι εύκολο να βρεθεί εάν ανήκουν στον ίδιον άνθρωπο.

Μα τι λες; Οτενετ, έχει η μισή Ελλάδα :)

quote:

Σε συμβουλεύω τα εξής:
Εάν πιστεύεις ότι έχεις κάτι να προσφέρεις, άνοιξε ένα Θέμα Συζήτησης με δικές σου απόψεις(μπορείς σε αυτήν την περίπτωση να παραθέσεις και υποστηρικτικά κείμενα από παραπομπές αλλά όχι σε ξένη γλώσσα). Το Θέμα αυτό θα πρέπει να ανοιχτεί σε ένα Forum που ταιριάζει σύμφωνα με αυτό που πραγματεύεται αλλιώς ή θα μεταφερθεί ή θα απενεργοποιηθεί.

1. Το θεμα αυτό ταιριαζε μια - χαρά στο "Θεραπεία" στο οποίο το είχα βάλει. Απλά ταιριάζει και εδώ.

2. Το αν ανοίξω ένα η δύο, είναι προβλημα μου , αλλιώς ασκεις λογοκρισία.

3. Συγνώμη , δεν γνωριζα πως το να ανεβάζω κειμενα απο βιβλία, απαγορευεται σε αυτό το φόρουμ, δεν θα το επαναλάβω...

4. To γεγονός πως είναι στα αγγλικά, γιατί σε πειράζει; Αφου δεν το βρήκα στα Ελληνικά;; Αλλωστε το δήλωσα, εξ αρχής.

5. Τα Αγγλικά Δεν είναι πλέον ξένη γλώσσα , βρισκόμαστε στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ενωση, αν θυμάσαι καλά.

Σε ευχαριστώ για την φιλοξενία..

- H επιστήμη της Ορθόδοξης Ψυχοθεραπείας - ΝΕΑ - Μέσα από το Διεθνές Internet31/12/2003, 15:41:29

quote:

Θα ήθελα να επισημάνω κάτι στον Άντμιν και σε αρκετούς άλλους για τις βάσιμες υποψίες τους.Πιστεύω ότι το μέλος @Χρήστος δεν έχει καμμία απολύτως σχέση με τον "κύριο" THGI ή όπως αλλιώς λεγόταν.
Οι λόγοι είναι οι εξής:
1) Τα κείμενα του μέλους THGI ήταν συνήθως από τη βίβλο, συγκεκριμένα από τη Γένεση, ΜΕ ΔΙΚΑ ΤΟΥ, ΠΡΟΚΛΗΤΙΚΑ ΠΟΛΛΕΣ ΦΟΡΕΣ, ΣΧΟΛΙΑ.
2) Τα κείμενα αυτά τα "κόλλαγε" ΠΟΛΛΕΣ φορές σε διάφορα νέα και ήδη υπάρχοντα θέματα, έτσι ώστε να μην είναι ευκολο να κλειδωθούν. Μάλιστα, το κείμενο που αρχίζει "At first God..." πρέπει να υπάρχει στο σάιτ τουλάχιστον 10 φορές. Και οι τίτλοι του ήταν προκλητικοί πολλές φορές.
3) Τα κείμενα του μέλους @χρήστος είναι διαφορετικά κάθε φορά, δεν έχουν προκλητική κριτική, και πιστεύω πως είναι χρήσιμα, αφού δεν προέρχονται από ένα βιβλίο ποιυ το έχουν ολοι οι χριστιανοί, αλλά από κάποιο που εμένα προσωπικά δεν είχε υποπέσει στην αντίληψή μου.
Βέβαια, αυτό το σύστημα, το να κολλάει κανείς αποσπάσματα από βιβλία, δεν υπηρετεί άμεσα τους σκοπούς του ΕΣΩΤΕΡΙΚΑ, που είναι η συζήτηση και ανταλλαγή απόψεων (πιστεύω) και άλλα, και καθιστά την πλοήγηση πιο δύσκολη, αλλά από το σχετικά μικρό χρονικό διάστημα (3 μόνο μήνες) που είμαι μέλος του εσωτέρικα, πιστεύω ότι δεν είναι το πρώτο ΝΕΟ μέλος που κάνει αυτό το λάθος.
Δεν θα ήταν καλό αν κάποιο νέο μέλος έχανε την ευκαιρία να περάσει καλά στο ωραίο αυτό φόρουμ λόγω μιας (ομολογουμένως!) κακής συγκυρίας. Ξέρω ότι αυτή την άποψη τη συμμερίζονται όλοι οι συντονιστές του φόρουμ, αλλά οι επιλογές (λόγω αυτής της συγκυρίας, αφού δεν υπάρχει η πιθανότητα να γίνει άμεσος έλεγχος της διαδυκτιακής ταυτότητας των 2 μελών) δεν ήταν πολλές, γι'αυτό υπήρξε αυτή η αντιμετώπιση.
Καλή πρωτοχρονιά!!!!
Ευτυχισμένο το ολυμπιακό έτος που στο τέλος του θα στείλει την ανεργία στα ουράνια! (δε θέλω να είμαι απαισιόδοξος, αλλά ρεαλιστής!)
Αυτάαα.... Ευχές!
-ΥΗVH
Light in extension
Solve et Coagula

Ευχαριστώ.

Να πω κάτι:
ΔΕΝ ΕΙΜΑΙ Ο THGI!!

Γραφω απο πολύ παλιά,(4-5 χρόνια), σε διάφορα φορα
Τον Thgi τον ξέρω απο άλλο φορουμ στο οποίο συχνάζω..

Γιατι να είμαι ο THGI δηλαδή; Επειδη έκανα 1-2 copy paste??
Ο THGI ανεβάζει συνήθως χωρία της Αγίας Γραφής.

Ουτε καποιο εμπρηστικό μυνημα, ανέβασα.

Δεν ήξερα πως απαγορευεται να βαζουμε κειμενα απο βιβλία σε αυτό το φόρουμ, γι'αυτό και ανέβασα τα προηγούμενα.
Ανέβασα όμως κείμενο ΚΑΙ ΔΙΚΟ ΜΟΥ, κειμενο, αρα δεν πρέπει να υπάρχει πρόβλημα..

Καλώς σας Βρήκα!

- H επιστήμη της Ορθόδοξης Ψυχοθεραπείας - ΝΕΑ - Μέσα από το Διεθνές Internet30/12/2003, 14:17:41

Αποσπάσματα απο το βιβλίο: "Ορθόδοξη Ψυχοθεραπεία" του Ι. Βλάχου

- H επιστήμη της Ορθόδοξης Ψυχοθεραπείας - ΝΕΑ - Μέσα από το Διεθνές Internet30/12/2003, 14:03:27

Αναδημοσίευση απο το: http://www.pelagia.org/htm/b02.en.orthodox_psychotherapy.00.htm

Δυστηχώς, βρήκα το κείμενο ΜΟΝΟ στα αγγλικά, αλλα όποιος θέλει , μπορεί να αγοράσει το βιβλίο. Οσοι έχουν καλή γνώση αγγλικών, δεν θα προβληματιστούν..

Many interpretations of Christianity have been formulated and many answers given to the questions: What is Christianity and what is its mission in the world? Most are not true. In what follows we shall seek to make it quite clear that Christianity, and especially Orthodoxy, is therapy. We shall also try to describe what therapy is and how it is attained.

1. What Christianity is
------------------------

Many people interpreting the character of Christianity see it as one of the numerous philosophies and religions known from antiquity. Certainly Christianity is not a philosophy in the sense that prevails today. Philosophy sets up a system of thought which in most cases bears no relationship to life. The main difference between Christianity and philosophy is that the latter is human thinking, while Christianity is a revelation of God. It is not a discovery by man but a revelation by God Himself to man. It was impossible for human logic to find the truths of Christianity. Where the human word was powerless, there came the divine-human Word, or Christ the Godman, the Word of God. This divine revelation was formulated in the philosophical terms of the time, but again it must be emphasised that it is not a philosophy. The garments of the divine-human Word are taken from the philosophy of that time.

St. John Chrysostom, interpreting Isaiah 3,1: "Behold the Lord, the Lord of Hosts, takes away from Jerusalem and from Judah...the mighty man and the soldier, the judge and the prophet, the diviner...", observes: "He seems here to be calling a diviner a person who is capable of conjecturing the future through profound intelligence and experience of things. Divining and prophesying are indeed two different things: the prophet, setting self aside, speaks under divine inspiration; the diviner for his part starts from what has already happened, puts his own intelligence to work and foresees many future events, as an intelligent person normally does. But the difference between them is great: it is the distance that separates human intelligence from divine grace" (1).

So speculation (or philosophy) is one thing, and prophecy, or the word of the prophet who theologises, is another. The former is a human activity while the latter is a revelation of the Holy Spirit.

In the patristic writings, and especially in the teaching of St. Maximus, philosophy is referred to as the beginning of the spiritual life. However, he used the term `practical philosophy' to mean cleansing the heart from passions, which really is the first stage of the soul's journey towards God.

Yet Christianity cannot be regarded as a religion, at least not as religion presents itself today. God is usually visualised as dwelling in heaven and directing human history from there: He is extremely exacting, seeking satisfaction from man, who has fallen to earth in his sickness and weakness. There is a wall of separation between God and man. This has to be surmounted by man, and religion is a very effective help. Various religious rites are employed for this purpose.

According to another view, man feels powerless in the universe and needs a mighty God to help him in his weakness. In this view God does not create man, but man creates God. Again, religion is conceived as man's relationship to the Absolute God, that is to say, the "relationship of the `I' to the Absolute Thou". Yet again, many regard religion as a means whereby the people are deluded into transferring their hopes to the future life. In this way strong powers put pressure on the people by means of religion.

But Christianity is something higher than these interpretations and theories; it cannot be contained within the usual conception and definition of religion given in the "natural" religions. God is not the Absolute Thou, but a living Person Who is in organic communion with man. Moreover Christianity does not simply transfer the problem to the future or await the delight of the kingdom of heaven after history and after the end of time. In Christianity the future is lived in the present and the kingdom of God begins in this life. According to the patristic interpretation, the kingdom of God is the grace of the Triune God, it is vision of the uncreated Light.

We Orthodox are not waiting for the end of history and the end of time, but through living in Christ we are running to meet the end of history and thus already living the life expected after the Second Coming. St. Symeon the New Theologian says that he who has seen the uncreated light and united with God is not awaiting the Second Coming of the Lord but living it. So the eternal embraces us at every moment of time. Therefore past, present and future are essentially lived in one unbroken unity. This is so-called condensed time.

Thus Orthodoxy cannot be characterised as the `opium of the people', precisely because it does not postpone the problem. It offers life, transforms biological life, sanctifies and transforms societies. Where Orthodoxy is lived in the right way and in the Holy Spirit, it is a communion of God and men, of heavenly and earthly, of the living and the dead. In this communion all the problems which present themselves in our life are truly resolved.

Yet since the membership of the Church includes sick people and beginners in the spiritual life, it is to be expected that some of them understand Christianity as religion in the sense referred to above. Moreover, the spiritual life is a dynamic journey. It begins with baptism, which is purification of the `image', and continues through ascetic living aimed at attaining `likeness', which is to say communion with God. Anyway it must be made clear that even when we still speak of Christianity as a religion we must do it with certain necessary presuppositions.

The first is that Christianity is mainly a Church. `Church' means `Body of Christ'. There are many places in the New Testament where Christianity is called the Church. We shall only mention Christ's words: "You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church" (Matt.16:18) and the words of the Apostle Paul to the Colossians: "And he is the head of the body, the church" (1:18) and to his disciple Timothy: "...so that you may know how you ought to conduct yourself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth" (1Tim,.3,15). This means that Christ does not simply dwell in heaven and direct history and the lives of men from there, but He is united with us. He assumed human nature and deified it; thus in Christ deified human nature is at the right hand of the Father. So Christ is our life and we are `members of Christ'.

The second presupposition is that the aim of the Christian is to attain the blessed state of deification. Deification is identical with `likeness', that is, to be like God. However, in order to reach the likeness, to attain the vision of God, and for this vision not to be a consuming fire but a life-giving light, purification must previously have taken place. This purification and healing is the Church's work. When the Christian participates in worship without undergoing life-giving purification - and moreover these acts of worship also aim towards man's purification - then he is not really living within the Church. Christianity without purification is utopia. So when we are being purified, especially when we are seeing to our healing, we can speak of religion. And this accords with the words of the Lord's brother James: "If anyone among you thinks he is religious, and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his own heart, this one's religion is useless. Pure and undefiled religion before God and the Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their trouble, and to keep oneself unspotted from the world" (Jas.1:26-27).

This abstinence gives us the right to claim that Christianity is neither philosophy nor `natural' religion, but mainly healing. It is the healing of a person's passions so that he may attain communion and union with God.

In the parable of the Good Samaritan the Lord showed us several truths. As soon as the Samaritan saw the man who had fallen among thieves who had wounded him and left him half dead, he "had compassion on him and went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine; and he set him on his own animal, brought him to an inn and took care of him" (Luk.10:33f). Christ treated the wounded man and brought him to the inn, to the Hospital which is the Church. Here Christ is presented as a physician who heals man's illnesses, and the Church as a Hospital.

It is very characteristic that in analysing this parable St. John Chrysostom presents the truths which we have just emphasised. Man went down "from the heavenly state to the state of the devil's deception, and he fell among thieves, that is, the devil and the hostile powers". The wounds which he sustained are the various sins. As David says, "My wounds are foul and festering because of my foolishness" (Ps.38:5). For "every sin brings bruises and wounds". The Samaritan is Christ Himself, who came down from heaven to earth to heal wounded man. He used wine and oil for the wounds. That is to say, "by mixing the Holy Spirit with his blood, he brought life to man". According to another interpretation, "oil brings the comforting word, wine provides the astringent lotion, the instruction which brings concentration to the scattered mind". He set him upon his own animal: "Taking flesh upon his own divine shoulders, he lifted it towards the Father in Heaven". Thereupon the good Samaritan, Christ, led the man "into the wonderful and spacious inn, this universal Church". He gave him to the innkeeper, who is the Apostle Paul and "through Paul to the high priests and teachers and ministers of each church", saying: "Take care of the people of the Gentiles whom I have given to you in the Church. Since men are sick, wounded by sin, heal them, putting on them a stone plaster, that is, the prophetic sayings and the gospel teachings, making them whole through the admonitions and exhortations of the Old and New Testaments." So according to St. John Chrysostom, Paul is the one who upholds the churches of God "and heals all men through spiritual admonitions, distributing the bread of offering to each one..." (2).

In St. John Chrysostom's interpretation of this parable it is clearly evident that the Church is a Hospital which heals those sick with sin, while the bishops and priests, like the Apostle Paul, are the healers of the people of God.

These truths also appear in many other places in the New Testament. The Lord said: "Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick" (Matt.9:12). Likewise Christ, as a physician of souls and bodies, was "...healing all kinds of sickness and all kinds of disease among the people...and they brought to him all sick people who were afflicted with various diseases and torments, and those who were demon-possessed, epileptics, and paralytics; and he healed them" (Matt.4:23f). The Apostle Paul is well aware that the conscience of men, especially of simple ones, is weak: "When you thus sin against the brethren, and wound their weak conscience, you sin against Christ" (ICor.8:12). The Book of Revelation says that John the Evangelist saw a river of the water of life proceeding from the throne of God and of the Lamb. "On either side of the river was the tree of life...and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations" (Rev.22:1f).

So the work of the Church is therapeutic. It seeks to heal men's sicknesses, mainly those of the soul, which torment them. This is the basic teaching of the New Testament and of the Fathers of the Church. In what follows in this chapter as well as in other chapters many passages from the Fathers will bring out this truth.

Here again I want to emphasise the indispensability of the Church. I am very grateful to the priest and professor John Romanides for laying stress on this in his writings. I am convinced that he is very well read in the neptic Fathers -especially in the writings contained in the Philokalia - and has therefore grasped the real meaning of Christianity. I believe that this is his great contribution. For in this era when Christianity is being presented as a philosophy or intellectual theology or a culture and popular tradition - customs and manners - he presents this teaching about a therapeutic discipline and treatment.

Concretely, he says: "Having faith in Christ without undergoing healing in Christ is not faith at all. Here is the same contradiction that we find when a sick person who has great confidence in his doctor never carries out the treatment which he recommends. If Judaism and its successor, Christianity, had appeared in the twentieth century for the first time, they would most likely have been characterised not as religions but as medical sciences related to psychiatry. They would have a wide influence on society owing to their considerable successes in healing the ills of the partially functioning personality. In no way can prophetic Judaism and Christianity be construed as religions that use various magical methods and beliefs to promise escape from a supposed world of matter and evil or hypocrisy into a supposed spiritual world of security and success" (3).

In another work the same professor says: "The patristic tradition is neither a social philosophy nor an ethical system, nor is it religious dogmatism: it is a therapeutic treatment. In this respect it closely resembles medicine, especially psychiatry. The spiritual energy of the soul that prays unceasingly in the heart is a physiological instrument which everyone has and which requires healing. Neither philosophy nor any of the known positive or social sciences is capable of healing this instrument. That can only be done through the Fathers' neptic and ascetic teaching. Therefore those who are not healed usually do not even know of the existence of this instrument" (4).

So in the Church we are divided into the sick, those undergoing therapeutic treatment, and those - saints - who have already been healed. "The Fathers do not categorise people as moral and immoral or good and bad on the basis of moral laws. This division is superficial. At depth humanity is differentiated into the sick in soul, those being healed and those healed. All who are not in a state of illumination are sick in soul...It is not only good will, good resolve, moral practice and devotion to the Orthodox Tradition which make an Orthodox, but also purification, illumination and deification. These stages of healing are the purpose of the mystical life of the Church, as the liturgical texts bear witness" (5).

2. Theology as a Therapeutic Science
-------------------------------------

From what has been said so far it is clear that Christianity is principally a science which cures, that is to say, a psychotherapeutic method and treatment. The same should be said of theology. It is not a philosophy but mainly a therapeutic treatment. Orthodox theology shows clearly that on the one hand it is a fruit of therapy and on the other hand it points the way to therapy. In other words, only those who have been cured and have attained communion with God are theologians, and they alone can show Christians the true way to reach the `place' of cure. So theology is both a fruit and a method of therapy.

Here we need to enlarge on what has been said in order to see these truths more clearly. We shall cite teachings of the Holy Fathers relating to theology and theologians.

I think that we should begin with St. Gregory Nazianzen, for it was not by chance that the Church gave him the title of Theologian. In the beginning of his famous theological texts he writes that it is not for everyone to theologise, to speak about God, because the subject is not so cheap and low. This work is not for all men but "for those who have been examined and are passed masters in the vision of God and who have previously been purified in soul and body, or at the very least are being purified". Only those who have passed from praxis to theoria, from purification to illumination, can speak about God. And when is this? "It is when we are free from all external defilement or disturbance, and when that which rules within us is not confused with vexations or erring images." Therefore the saint advises: "For it is necessary to be truly at ease to know God" (6).

Neilos the Ascetic links theology with prayer, principally with noetic prayer. We know very well from the teaching of the Holy Fathers that anyone who has acquired the grace of prayer of the heart has entered the first stages of the vision of God, for this type of prayer is a form of theoria. Therefore all who pray with the nous have communion with God, and this communion is man's spiritual knowledge of God. So St. Neilos says: "If you are a theologian, you will pray truly. And if you pray truly, you are a theologian" (7).

St. John Climacus introduces true theology in many places in his spiritually delightful `Ladder'. "Total purity is the foundation for theology." "When a man's senses are perfectly united to God, then what God has said is somehow mysteriously clarified. But where there is no union of this kind, then it is extremely difficult to speak about God" (8). On the contrary, the man who does not actually know God speaks about Him only "in probabilities" (9). Indeed according to patristic teaching it is very bad to speak in conjectures about God, because it leads a person to delusion. This saint knows how "the theology of the demons" develops in us. In vainglorious hearts which have not previously been purified by the operation of the Holy Spirit, the unclean demons "give us lessons in the interpretation of scripture" (10). Therefore a slave of passion should not "dabble in theology" (11).

The saints received "divine things without thought", and according to the Fathers, they theologised not in an Aristotelian way through thinking, but "in the manner of the Apostles", that is to say through the operation of the Holy Spirit. If a person has not been cleansed of passions, especially fantasy, beforehand, he is unable to converse with God or to speak about God, since a nous "forming notions is incapable of theology". The saints lived a theology "written by the Spirit".

We find the same teaching in the works of St. Maximus the Confessor. When a person lives by practical philosophy, which is repentance and cleansing from passions, "he advances in moral understanding". When he experiences theoria, "he advances in spiritual knowledge". In the first case he can discriminate between virtues and vices; the second case, theoria, "leads the participant to the inner qualities of incorporeal and corporeal things". St. Maximus goes on to say that man is "granted the grace of theology when, carried on wings of love" in theoria and "with the help of the Holy Spirit, he discerns - as far as this is possible for the human nous - the qualities of God" (12). Theology, the knowledge of God, is unfolded to the person who has attained theoria. Indeed in another place the same Father says that a person who always "concentrates on the inner life" not only becomes restrained, long-suffering, kind and humble, but "he will also be able to contemplate, theologise and pray" (13). Here too theology is closely connected with theoria and prayer.

It must be emphasised that a theology that is not the result of purification, that is, of `praxis', is demonic. According to St. Maximus, "knowledge without praxis is the demons' theology" (14).

St. Thalassios, who had the same perspective, wrote that when man's nous begins with simple faith, it "will eventually attain a theology that transcends the nous and that is characterised by unremitting faith of the highest type and the vision of the invisible" (15). Theology is beyond logic, it is a revelation of God to man, and the Fathers define it as theoria. Here too theology is chiefly vision of God. In another place the same saint wrote that genuine love gives birth to spiritual knowledge, and "this is succeeded by the desire of all desires: the grace of theology" (16).

In the teaching of St. Diadochos of Photiki theology is presented as the greatest gift offered to man by the Holy Spirit. All God's gifts of grace are "flawless", "but the gift which inflames our heart and moves it to the love of His goodness more than any other is theology". For theology, as "the early offspring of God's grace," "bestows on the soul the greatest gifts" (17).

According to the Apostle Paul, the Holy Spirit gives spiritual knowledge to one person and wisdom to another (ICor.12,8). Interpreting this, St. Diadochos says that spiritual knowledge unites man to God but does not move him to express outwardly what he knows. There are monks who love hesychia and are illuminated by the grace of God "yet do not speak about God". Wisdom is one of the rarest gifts, one which God gives to the person who has both expression and a capacious intellect. Therefore knowledge of God "comes through prayer, deep stillness and complete detachment, while wisdom comes through humble meditation on Holy Scripture and, above all, through grace given by God" (18). The gift of theology is a work of the Holy Spirit but in cooperation with man, since the Holy Spirit does not actualise in man a spiritual knowledge of the mysteries "apart from that faculty in him which naturally searches out such knowledge" (19).

In the teaching of St. Gregory Palamas it is those who see God who are properly theologians, and theology is theoria. "For there is a knowledge about God and His doctrines, a theoria which we call theology..." (20). Anyone who without knowledge and experience of matters of faith offers teaching about them "according to his own reasonings, trying with words to show the Good that transcends all words, has plainly lost all sense." And in his folly "he has become an enemy of God" (21). Moreover there are cases in which people without having works, that is to say, without having undergone purification, have met and listened to holy men, but then they "try to form their own conceptions" and both reject the holy man and puff themselves up with pride (22).

All these things show that theology is properly the fruit of man's healing and not a rational discipline. Only a person who has been purified or at least is being purified can be initiated into the ineffable mysteries and great truths, can receive revelations and afterwards convey them to the people. Therefore in the Orthodox patristic tradition theology is linked and identified with the spiritual father, and the spiritual father is the theologian par excellence - that is to say, the one who experiences the things of God and so can lead his spiritual children unerringly.

Father John Romanides writes characteristically: "The true Orthodox theologian is the one who has direct knowledge of some of God's energies through illumination or knows them more through vision. Or he knows them indirectly through prophets, apostles and saints or through scripture, the writings of the Fathers and the decisions and acts of their Ecumenical and Local Councils. The theologian is the one who through this direct or mediated spiritual knowledge and vision knows clearly how to distinguish between the actions of God and those of creatures and especially the works of the devil and the demons. Without the gift of discernment of spirits it is not possible to test spirits to see whether something is the action of the Holy Spirit or of the devil and the demons.

Therefore the theologian and the spiritual father are the same thing. A person who thinks and talks in search of a conceptual understanding of the doctrines of the faith after the Franco-Latin pattern certainly is not a spiritual father, nor can he be called a theologian in the proper sense of the word. Theology is not abstract knowledge or practice, like logic, mathematics, astronomy and chemistry, but on the contrary, it has a polemical character like logistics and medicine. The former is concerned with matters of defence and attack through bodily drill and strategies for the deployment of weapons, fortifications and defensive and offensive schemes, while the latter is fighting against mental and physical illnesses for the sake of health and the means of restoring health.

A theologian who is not acquainted with the methods of the enemy nor with perfection in Christ is not only unable to struggle against the enemy for his own perfection, but is also in no position to guide and heal others. It is like being called a general, or even being one, without ever having been trained or fought, or studied the art of war, having only given attention to the beautiful, glorious appearance of the army in its splendid, bright uniforms at receptions and displays. It is like a butcher posing as a surgeon or like holding the position of a physician without knowing the causes of illnesses or the methods of curing them, or the state of health to which the patient should be restored (23).

3. What Therapy is
-------------------

Since we have said that Christianity and theology are primarily a therapeutic science, we must now outline briefly what therapy is. What does Orthodoxy with its theology and worship cure in us?

Therapy of the soul essentially means therapy and freeing of the nous. Human nature became `sick' through its fall away from God. This sickness is mainly the captivity and fall of the nous. The ancestral sin is that man withdrew from God, lost divine grace, and this resulted in blindness, darkness and death of the nous. We can say more accurately that "the fall of man or the state of having inherited sin is: a) the failure of his noetic power to function soundly or even to function at all, b) the confusion of this power with the functions of the brain and of the body in general, and c) its resulting subjection to mental anguish and to the surrounding conditions. Every person has experience of the fall of his own noetic power to varying degrees, as he is exposed to an environment in which this power is not functioning or is below par... Malfunctioning of the noetic power results in bad relations between man and God and between people. It also results in the individual's making use of both God and fallen man to fortify his personal safety and happiness" (24).

This loss of the grace of God deadened man's nous; his whole nature sickened, and he handed this sickness on to his descendants as well. In Orthodox teaching this is how we understand the inheritance of sin. The Fathers interpret St. Paul's "as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners" (Rom.5,19) not in legal terms but `medically'. That is to say, human nature became sick. St. Cyril of Alexandria interprets the situation thus: "After Adam fell by sin and sank into corruption, at once impure pleasures rushed in, and the law of the jungle sprang up in our members. So nature became sick with sin through the disobedience of one, Adam. Then the many became sinners, not as fellow transgressors with Adam, for they did not even exist, but as being of that nature which had fallen under the law of sin.... Human nature in Adam became sick through the corruption of disobedience, and thus the passions entered into it" (25). In another place the same Father uses the image of the root. Death came to the whole human race by Adam, "just as when the root of a plant is injured, all the young shoots that come from it must wither" (26).

St. Gregory Palamas says characteristically: "The nous which has rebelled against God becomes either bestial or demonic and, after having rebelled against the laws of nature, lusts after what belongs to others..." (27).

Through the "rite of birth in God", holy baptism, man's nous is illuminated, freed from slavery to sin and the devil, and is united with God. That is why baptism is called illumination. But after that, because of sin, the nous is again darkened and deadened. The patristic writings make it clear that every sin and every passion deadens the nous.

St. John of the Ladder writes that the evil demons strive "to darken our spirit". Especially the demon of unchastity "by darkening our minds, which guide us, pushes people "to do things that only the mad would think of" (28).

In another chapter attention will be given to the nature of man's nous. Here we are mainly concerned with the subject of darkening. St. Maximus teaches: "As the world of the body consists of things, so the world of the nous consists of conceptual images. And as the body fornicates with the body of a woman, so the nous, forming a picture of its own body, fornicates with the conceptual image of a woman" (29). This is the darkness and fall of the nous.

In another connection the same holy Father teaches that "when the body sins through material things and has the bodily virtues to teach it self-restraint, so too when the nous sins through impassioned conceptual images, it has the virtues of the soul to instruct it" (30). This truth shows that the fall of the nous creates confusion in the whole spiritual organism. It creates anguish and agitation and in general makes the person live the fall in all its tragicalness. Thus many problems which plague us come from this inner sickness. That is why the psychotherapists cannot help very much, since it is only Christ who can restore the nous deadened by passions.

Again St. Maximus, trying to define more clearly what is impurity of the nous and hence its fall, writes that it consists in four things: "first in having false knowledge; secondly in being ignorant of any of the universals...; thirdly in having impassioned thoughts; and fourthly in assenting to sin" (31).

So the nous needs therapy, a therapy which the Fathers call quickening and purifying the nous.

A great deal is said about purity of mind and heart in the teachings of the Lord and the Apostles. The Lord, referring to the Pharisees of his time who were careful of external purity and neglected inner purity, said: "Blind Pharisee, first cleanse the inside of the cup and dish, that the outside of them may be clean also" (Matt.23,26). At the Apostles' meeting in Jerusalem Peter, confronting the problem of the Christian Gentiles as to whether they must first be circumcised and keep the law of the Old Testament, said: "God, who knows the heart, acknowledged them, by giving them the Holy Spirit just as he did to us, and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith" (Acts 15,8f). The Apostle Paul recommended to the Christians of Corinth: "Let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God" (2Cor.,7,1). The blood of Christ shall "purge your conscience from dead works" (Heb.9,14). Likewise the same Apostle, writing to his disciple Timothy, affirms that we hold the mystery of the faith "with a pure conscience" (1 Tim,3,9). And the Apostle Peter is well aware that love for one another is the fruit of a pure heart, so he says: "Love one another fervently with a pure heart" (1 Pet.1,22).

So purification of the nous and heart is essential. We write about the nous and the heart even though we know that in patristic theology these two are joined together. We shall come back to that, however, in another chapter.

St. Maximus divides the spiritual life into three stages. They are practical philosophy natural theoria and mystical theology. According to a study of Maximus, "his teaching about a personal approach to salvation, is divided into three basic parts: 1) `practical philosophy' or praxis 2) `natural theoria' or simply theoria and 3) `mystical theology' or simply theology. The first purifies a person of passions and adorns him with virtues; the second illuminates his nous with true knowledge; and the third crowns him with the highest mystical experience, which St. Maximus calls `ecstasy'. These three parts constitute the basic stages on the path of man's personal salvation (32).

Indeed it must be noted that many Fathers distinguish these three stages in the spiritual life: practical philosophy or purification of the heart, natural theoria or illumination of the nous, and mystical theology or communion with God through theoria.

According to another division which appears in the patristic writings, the spiritual life is separated into praxis and theoria. This is not a distinction clearly opposed to the preceding one, but really the same thing. For praxis is purification, and theoria is illumination of the nous and communion with God. In any case praxis precedes theoria, the vision of God. "Praxis is the patron of theoria" (33). More analytically, "praxis where the body is concerned consists of fasting and vigil, where the mouth is concerned it consists of psalmody. But prayer is better than psalmody, and silence more valuable than speech. In the case of the hands, praxis is what they do uncomplainingly..." (34). And: "Theoria is the nous's vision; it is to be amazed and to understand all that has been and is to be." (35).

Certainly according to St. Maximus' teaching, theoria is not independent of praxis. "Praxis is not safe without theoria, nor is theoria true without praxis. For praxis must be intelligent and theoria must be efficacious...". Maximus does emphasise that "in the case of the more learned, theoria precedes praxis, whereas with simpler people praxis comes first". In both cases however, the outcome is good, they lead to the same result, the purification and salvation of man (36).

Actually when we speak of purifying the soul, we mean principally releasing it from the passions (37), or rather transforming the passions. Furthermore, purification is also the "uniform development" of the human being, which leads to illumination of the nous. So purification is not only negative but also positive. The qualities of a pure soul are "intelligence devoid of envy, ambition free from malice, and unceasing love for the Lord of glory" (38). In other words, if we are motivated by envy and our ambition contains malice and our love for God is not unceasing, it means that our heart has not yet been purified.

The nous is that which is in the image of God. We have defiled this image with sin and it must now be cleansed. Therefore Abba Dorotheos requests: "Let us make our image pure as we received it..."(39). We shall have to suffer toil and intolerable bitterness until we have purified our nous, that "cur sniffing around the meat market and revelling in the uproar" (40). If a man struggles not to commit sin and battles against passionate thoughts, he is humiliated and shattered in the fight, "but the sufferings of combat purify him little by little and bring him back to the natural state" (41).

Yet beside man's effort, if the Holy Spirit does not descend, the dead nous cannot be purified and brought to life, because "only the Holy Spirit can purify the nous" (42).

In any case, when, through the working together of divine grace and the human will, the nous has been purified, then it is illuminated, since "where there is purifying there is illumination" (43). After purification, if a person guards his nous from defilement by sin, his nous is illuminating and illuminated. That is why guarding the nous can be called "light-producing, lightning-producing, light-giving and fire-bearing" (44).

Briefly, we can affirm that man's cure is in fact purification of the nous, heart, and image, the restoration of the nous to its primordial and original beauty, and something more: his communion with God. When he becomes a temple of the Holy Spirit, we say that the cure has succeeded. Those cured are the saints of God.

4. Method of Therapy - Therapeutic Treatment
---------------------------------------------

Having seen what Christianity is, what the character of Orthodox theology is, what therapy is, we shall now look at the method of therapeutic treatment, which is the method of the Orthodox faith. If we have so far located the problem, we must now do our best to make an inventory of the methods for achieving purity of heart, that is, the cure. For there is no great point in listing the higher states unless we go on to bring them to awareness and apply them.

How then is the soul cured?
First we must emphasise right faith. We Orthodox attach great importance to preserving the faith, just because we know that when faith is distorted, the cure is automatically distorted. We have previously emphasised that theology should be interpreted as medicine. Medical science has the healthy person in view when it tries to guide the sick person to health by various therapeutic methods. We can say the same thing about theology. Theology is the teaching of the Church about spiritual health, but also about the path which we sick must follow in order to be healed. That is why we Orthodox give great weight to keeping the doctrine intact, not only because we fear the impairment of a teaching, but because we could lose the possibility of a cure and therefore of salvation. Furthermore, "the conflict between Palamas and Barlaam was not so much about the type of doctrine as about its methodological foundation. Barlaam based himself on metaphysics and metaphysical epistemology and logic, while Palamas took as his basis empirical verification and confirmation and their demonstrable results" (45).

Now in order to be cured it is essential to feel that one is ill. When a sick person is not aware of his illness, he cannot turn to a doctor. Self-knowledge is one of the first steps to a cure. St. Maximus teaches: "The person who has come to know the weakness of human nature has gained experience of divine power", and he is eager to achieve some things and has achieved other things through this divine power (46). Peter of Damascus, describing the great value of prayer at night, says: "Practice of the moral virtues is effectuated by meditating on what has happened during the day", when we meditate on the lapses that occurred "in the confusion of the day", "so that during the stillness of the night we can become aware of the sins we have committed and can grieve over them" (47). Only when we know our state can we grieve about it.

It is an indisputable fact that most Christians today are unaware of their spiritual condition. We are "dead in trespasses" and not only do not perceive it but even have the feeling that we are filled with the gifts of the Holy Spirit, adorned with virtues. Unfortunately, this self-satisfaction which plagues us is destroying the work of salvation. How can Christ speak to a person who justifies himself? We are like the Pharisee in the time of the Lord who did not feel the need of a physician. How can the great gift of repentance and mourning unfold in a heart which does not feel its desolation, when the inner life is unable to develop?

In connection with the sense of being ill there should also be "self-condemnation", that is, the great gift of self-reproach. It shows that there is humility in the soul, since "self-reproach is always associated with humility" (48). This self-reproach is a spiritual burden which, when placed upon the soul, "crushes and presses and squeezes out the salutary wine that rejoices the heart of man, that is, our inner man. Compunction is such a wine." Self-reproach, with the mourning which characterises it, also crushes the passions and fills the heart with most blissful joy (49). "We must always condemn and criticise ourselves in order that by means of deliberately chosen humiliations we may protect ourselves from unwitting sin" (50).

But the sense of being ill is not enough in itself. In any case a therapist is required as well. This therapist is the priest, the spiritual father. He has first been cured of his own ailments or at least is struggling to be cured, and then he also cures his spiritual children. We have said before that the spiritual father must be a theologian, and vice versa. So in this case the saying applies "Physician, heal yourself" ((Lk.4,23). One who has come through the devil's devices can safely guide his spiritual children. One who has come to know the great treasure called spiritual health can help others too to be cured. Anyone who has found his nous can help others too to find it. "The truly physician-like nous is one that first heals itself and then heals others of the diseases of which it has been cured" (51).

Many contemporary Christians regard priests as ministers of the Most High and as church officials who are helpful in various bureaucratic dealings, who perform the different sacraments when they are needed or celebrate the Divine Liturgy, and in this way can satisfy the need of their souls or fulfil a traditional duty. They are regarded as magicians who work magic! We know, however, that the grace of God is not transmitted magically or mechanically, but sacramentally. It is true that even an unworthy priest performs sacraments, but he cannot cure. For remission of sins is one thing but curing is another. Most Christians are satisfied with a formal confession or formal attendance at the Liturgy or even with a formal Communion and nothing more. They do not proceed to the cure of their souls. But the priests, the spiritual fathers, not only celebrate Communion but they cure people. They have a sound knowledge of the path of healing from passions and they make it known to their spiritual children. They show them how they can be freed from captivity, how their nous will be freed from slavery.

Here is how the holy Fathers view spiritual fatherhood. The pastor is also a physician. "A physician is one whose body and soul are sound, needing no plasters on them" (52). St. John of the Ladder is very characteristic on what the priest should do in order to give healing:

"O wondrous man, acquire plasters, potions, razors, eye salves, sponges, instruments for blood-letting and cauterisation, ointments, sleeping draughts, a knife, bandages, and something against nausea (disgust at the stench of wounds). If we do not put these things to use, how are we to practise our science? There is no way, because physicians receive payment not for words but for deeds.

"A plaster is a cure for passions which are external, that is, bodily passions. A potion is a cure for inner passions and to drain off invisible uncleanness. A razor is humiliation which bites, but purifies the rot of conceit. An eye salve is for cleansing the eye of the soul which has been clouded by anger. An eye salve is a caustic chastisement which speedily brings healing. Blood-letting is a draining of unseen stench. Again, the blood-letting instrument is pre-eminently an intensive and brief remedy for the salvation of the sick. A sponge is used after the blood-letting to heal and refresh the patient with the gentle, meek and tender words of the physician. Cauterisation is a rule and a penance given with love to the sinner for a definite period of time for his repentance. An ointment is the soothing offered to the patient with a few words or some small consolation after cauterisation.

"A sleeping draught is that we lift the person's burden, and through an obedience give him rest and waking sleep and holy blindness to his own virtues. Bandages are for binding and strengthening those who are enervated and enfeebled by vainglory. The last instrument is the knife, which is a sentence and a decree to cut off a putrid member and a body dead in soul lest he spread his contagion among the rest.

"Blessed and praiseworthy are the `non-disgust' of the physicians and the dispassion among shepherds. The former, not suffering from nausea, untiringly strive to dispel the stench. The latter will be able to restore to life every dead soul" (53).

Fr. John Romanides writes: "The successful repetition of the experience of confirmation, which in medical and patristic science is cure, is the truth of every science. Just as it is absurd to say that one who does not cure and does not know how to cure is a physician, so it is senseless to regard as a theologian one who is not at least in the state of illumination, who does not know what illumination and deification are, and who does not know how these things are achieved and therefore does not cure" (54).

Father John also writes: "It is assumed that above all others the therapists who guide the sick into these stages of therapy are the bishops and priests, the former having mostly come from monasticism. Today, however, after a century and a half of catastrophic neo-hellenic propaganda against hesychasm, such clergy are rare. There are few hesychast monks. The priesthood as described by Dionysios the Areopagite has almost disappeared" (55).

The therapist priest also recommends to his spiritual children an orthodox way, which is a way of orthodox devotion. Therefore in what follows we want to turn to that point, to describe the method which the sick person should follow under the guidance of his spiritual father in order to attain spiritual healing.

We want particularly to point to asceticism. "The forceful practice of self control and love, patience and stillness, will destroy the passions hidden within us" (56). Nicetas St. Stethatos, disciple of St. Symeon the New Theologian, describes this ascetic practice. Man has five senses, so the ascetic practices are five in number: vigils, study, prayer, self-control and hesychia. The ascetic should combine the five senses with these five practices: sight with vigils, hearing with study, smell with prayer, taste with self-control and touch with hesychia. When he succeeds in making these links, "he quickly purifies the nous of his soul and by this refining makes it dispassionate and clear-sighted" (57).

We can say briefly that to practise asceticism is to apply God's law, to keep His commandments. The effort which we make to subordinate the will of man to the will of God, and to be changed by this, is called ascesis. We are well aware from the teaching of our holy Fathers that the whole Gospel consists of "precepts of salvation". What is contained in Scripture is God's commandment, which must be kept by those who seek their salvation. This is seen clearly in the Beatitudes (Matt.5,1-12).

"Blessed are the poor in spirit" is the Lord's commandment that we should look for our spiritual poverty, that is, that we should experience our wretchedness. "Blessed are those who mourn" is the Lord's commandment to weep over the passions which we have in us, over our desolation. "Blessed are those who hunger and thirst after righteousness" is the Lord's commandment to hunger and thirst after communion with God. "Blessed are the pure in heart" is Christ's commandment to purify our hearts. When He says "blessed" it is as if He said: "Become poor, mournful, thirsting for righteousness", and so forth.

So Christ's commandment is unceasing prayer, celebration of the Divine Liturgy, watchfulness, that is attention of the nous, purity of heart, and so forth. "The law is holy and the commandment holy and just and good" (Rom.7,12). John the Evangelist, the disciple of love, emphasises to the Christians: "Now by this we know that we know Him, if we keep His commandments. He who says, `I know Him,' and does not keep His commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him. But whoever keeps His word, truly the love of God is perfected in him. By this we know that we are in Him" (1Jn.2,3-5). The same Evangelist emphasises authoritatively: "For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments" (1Jn.5,3).

"The aim of our hierarchy is to make us as much like God as possible and to unite us to Him. But Scripture teaches us that we will only attain this through the most loving observance of the commandments and the performance of divine services," according to St. Dionysios the Areopagite (58). St. Gregory Palamas teaches that knowledge of created things comes from doing virtuous deeds. And when asked what is the aim of virtuous deeds, he writes: "Union with God and becoming like Him" (59). Doing virtuous deeds is connected with keeping the commandments. This hesychast saint remarks further that love for God "comes only through the sacred performance of the divine commandments" (60).

In what follows I would like to mention some sayings of the Fathers about the value of God's commandments.

"The whole purpose of the Saviour's commandments is to free the nous from dissipation and hatred" (61).

God's commandments "excel all the treasures of the world". A man who has gained inward possession of them finds the Lord in them" (62).

The keeping of God's commandments generates dispassion. The soul's dispassion preserves spiritual knowledge" (63).

Obedience to God's commandment "is the resurrection of the dead" (64).

St. Gregory of Sinai, describing the two basic ways of operation of the Holy Spirit, which we receive secretly in Holy Baptism, regards keeping the commandments as one of them. "The more we keep the commandments, the more manifestly the Holy Spirit sheds its brilliant light on us" (65).

All these things show how essential the ascetic life is for healing and restoring the soul. And as we have said, this ascetic life is primarily the keeping of the commandments of Christ the Saviour.

The basic commandments which effect our spiritual healing -as we also say in the troparia that we sing in the Church - are "fasting, vigils and prayer".

If almsgiving heals the soul's incensive power and prayer purifies the nous, fasting withers sensual desire (66) and thus the whole soul is offered to God healed. Fasting also humbles the body: "Privation of food mortifies the body of the monk" (67). Yet excessive fasting not only weakens the body but "makes the contemplative faculty of the soul dejected and disinclined to concentrate" (68).

St. John of the Ladder speaks characteristically of fasting: "To fast is to do violence to nature. It is to do away with whatever pleases the palate. Fasting ends lust, roots out bad thoughts, frees one from evil dreams. Fasting makes for purity of prayer, an enlightened soul, a watchful mind, a deliverance from blindness. Fasting is the door of compunction, humble sighing, joyful contrition, and end to chatter, an occasion for stillness, a custodian of obedience, a lightening of sleep, health of the body, an agent of dispassion, a remission of sins, the gate, indeed the delight of Paradise" (69).

All these things which he mentions, on the one hand show the scope of fasting, and on the other hand indicate the fruits which it brings to the striving soul. That is why all the saints loved fasting. It is very important to mention that when a person begins to repent, he also begins to fast of his own accord, which shows that fasting goes with prayer and repentance.

To be sure, fasting is a means and not an end, it is "a tool for training those who desire self-restraint" (70), but without it, it is almost impossible to conquer the passions and attain dispassion. St. John of the Ladder is clear about this. As the Hebrews freed themselves from Pharaoh and experienced the Passover after eating bitter herbs and unleavened bread, so we too will be freed from the inner Pharaoh through fasting and humility: "You must not fool yourself. You will not escape from Pharaoh, and you will not see the heavenly Passover unless you constantly eat bitter herbs and unleavened bread, the bitter herbs of toil and hard fasting; and the unleavened bread of a mind made humble" (71).

It is essential that we keep the fasts which the Church has fixed, and strive not to give fullest satisfaction to the demands of the flesh.

Apart from fasting, another means of healing is the vigil. Through keeping vigils, which is also an ascetic method for therapy, a person is purified and healed of passions. The Lord taught us how to pray at night. He himself spent whole nights on the mountain. "And when he had sent the multitudes away, he went up on a mountain by himself to pray. And when evening had come, he was alone there" (Matt.14,23).

The holy Fathers experienced in their lives the beneficial effect of vigils. St. Isaac says in his ascetic writings: "A monk who perseveres in vigil with a discerning nous will not seem to be clad with flesh, for this is truly the work of the angelic estate." A soul which labours and excels in the practice of vigils "will have the eyes of Cherubim, that she may at all times gaze upon and espy celestial visions" (72).

St. John of the Ladder, with all his characteristic delicacy presents the model of a wakeful monk and the benefits of vigils: "Alertness keeps the mind clean. Somnolence binds the soul. The alert monk does battle with fornication, but the sleepy one goes to live with it. Alertness is a quenching of lust, deliverance from fantasies, a tearful eye, a heart made soft and gentle, thoughts restrained, food digested, passions tamed, spirits subdued, tongue controlled, idle imaginings banished. The vigilant monk is a fisher of thoughts, and in the quiet of the night he can easily observe and catch them" (73).

Prayer too goes with vigil. This is the method par excellence which heals the diseases of the soul. For much grace comes to the soul of man through prayer. But we shall deal with noetic prayer and the method we use in order to free the nous and see God when we come to the chapter entitled "Hesychia as a method of therapy". This is because we regard it as the most important means for the salvation of man.

There are also other therapeutic means for curing every passion of the soul. But we shall deal with them at length in a later chapter entitled "Orthodox Pathology".

Perhaps the reader is thinking that all these therapeutic means, which are salves for the eye of the heart (cf.Rev.3,18) can only be practised by monks. This certainly not true. Everyone, even we who live in the world, can live by the commandments of Christ. Prayer, repentance, mourning, compunction, fasting, vigil, and so on, are commandments of Christ, which means that everyone can live by them. Christ did not say things that are impossible for man. St. Gregory Palamas, speaking about purity of heart, emphasises that "it is possible even for those living a married life to pursue this purity, but with very great difficulty" (74). Everyone can develop a life according to the Gospel by making the corresponding adjustment.

Moreover if there is a bishop and a divine Liturgy, it means that salvation is possible. Why does the Church exist and function? What is more, there is an appropriate application of Christ's commandments for each person. In patristic literature we have such cases. The Fathers, who have themselves been healed, have acquired the grace of discernment and they advise each person to find his path, which is essentially the path of the Orthodox tradition.

St. John of the Ladder is characteristic on this point. He tells of having seen a stupid physician dishonour and drive to despair a sick man who was contrite and humble in spirit. At the same time he had seen another "intelligent" spiritual physician operate on an "arrogant heart" with the knife of dishonour and thereby drain it of all the evil smell. He also says that he saw the same sick man sometimes treating his uncleanness with the medicine of obedience and sometimes healing "the sick eye of his soul" with stillness and silence (75). Here it seems clear that the same sick man needed obedience at one time and stillness and silence at another. The appropriate medicines must be given at the appropriate time.

A discerning confessor, the same saint also says: "One man's medicine can be another man's poison." What is more, the same preparation for the same sick person can at one time be a medicine and at another time a poison. When given at a suitable time it serves as a medicine, but at the wrong time it is a poison (76).

Therefore we emphasise once more that a discriminating Orthodox therapist (physician-confessor) is essential for adjusting the medication and giving the appropriate therapeutic guidance.

In what follows I would like to quote some sayings of the desert fathers in which it is clearly apparent that there is variety in ascetic practice and great possibility for adjustment.

Someone asked St. Anthony: "What must one do in order to please God?" And he answered: "Wherever you go, have God before your eyes, whatever you do and say, have the Scriptures as your witness, and whatever place you are in, do not move away quickly. Keep these three and you will be saved" (77).

Another Father asked Abba Nistheroes: "What good work is there that I could do?" And he answered: "Are not all actions equal? Scripture says that Abraham was hospitable and God was with him. David was humble, and God was with him. Elias loved interior peace and God was with him. So, do whatever your soul desires according to God and guard your heart" (78).

Joseph of Thebes says: "Three works are approved in the eyes of the Lord; the first, when a man is ill and temptations fall upon him, if he welcomes them with gratitude; secondly, when someone carries out all his works purely in the presence of God, having no regard for anything human; in the third place, when someone remains in submission to a spiritual father in complete renunciation of his own will. This last will gain a lofty crown indeed." And then he accentuates, "As for me, I have chosen illness" (79).

Likewise Abba Poemen said: If three men are in the same place and one of them fully preserves interior peace, and the second gives thanks to God in illness, and the third serves with a pure mind, these three are doing the same work" (80).

From all these examples it seems that men's struggle is a common one, but their ways of struggling vary. All have to keep the word of God, God's commandments, all must guard the purity of their hearts wherever they are working. Nevertheless there is a variety of applications which the spiritual father can make.

It may well be regarded as a shortcoming that we have not also listed Holy Communion within therapeutic treatment. But we must underline and lay great stress on the fact that we regard the Eucharist, the communion of the Body and Blood of Christ as indispensable for man. The Lord emphasised: "Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you"(John 6,53). But it is well known that holy Communion is preceded by purification and preparation. If the therapy about which we are speaking here does not come first, then the receiving of the Body and Blood of Christ is "unto judgement and condemnation". Ecclesiology and eschatology cannot be understood without therapeutic training. So we are not undervaluing the Holy Eucharist, but by emphasising the value of ascetic practice and therapy we are exalting the great gift of the Eucharist. On the other hand, the aim of what we have written is mainly to make clear the precise path which ends at the altar, so that Holy Communion may become light and life.

I hope that these few words have shown clearly that Christianity is a therapeutic science. It heals sick man. This sickness is made evident in the nous. The Church with its teaching, worship, ascesis and sacraments frees the nous and makes it a temple of the Holy Spirit. This therapeutic way has been applied and confirmed by all the saints. It is the only path which leads to God. I think that the loss of the tradition is to be seen chiefly in the loss of the therapeutic method and of actual therapists. The way back to the Orthodox Tradition is essentially the way back to these two foundations.