- AΠΟΚΑΛΥΨΗ ΚΑΙ 666 - .-= ΜΥΘΟΣ & ΘΡΗΣΚΕΙΑ =-.

AGAPA GIA NA MIN MISIS.

AGAPA GIA NA MIN MISIS.

Ode E sophia estin o echOn. noun psEphisatO ton arithmon tou thEriou, arithmos gar anthrOpou estin, kai o arithmos autou exakosioi exEkonta ex. (E=eta, e=epsilon, O=omega,, o=omicron)
Translations vary because they attempt to make passages sound natural and avoid cumbersome constructions. However, the most accurate translations resemble this (from the 1958 Amplified New Testament):

Here is [room for] discernment [a call for the wisdom of interpretation]. Let anyone who has intelligence (penetration and insight enough) calculate the number of the beast, for it is a human number [the number of a certain man]; his number is six-hundred sixty six.
Notably, some early Greek texts read "six-hundred ten six", that is, 616. Why was the specific number 666 (or 616) chosen for this passage? The wording clearly indicates that some effort and calculation will be needed, and that something isn't directly obvious without applying this "wisdom". Since it says "calculate this number" in one place, but then goes on to say "[the] number is 666", there is a contradiction: what would the reader have to calculate if the writer gives away the answer in the next phrase? There are two ways to interpret the contradiction: either the number itself is unspecified (and 666 is just a metaphor), or else 666 is indeed the answer but the method of calculation to produce it is unspecfied.
David Wells suggests the first interpretation, when he points out the fact that 666 in Roman numerals (DCLXVI) was often used as a generic way of referring to any unspecified or unknown large number. (616 would have been similar, DCXVI). "DCLXVI" is a Roman slang way of saying "any big long number", like our colloquial slang "zillion", because big numbers in Roman numerals always end up being long unmanagable strings with lots of different letters in them. Thus, the writer of Revelation might have been using "666" to mean "an unspecified or unknown large number". This makes sense because of the fact that the writer says wisdom is needed to calculate the number: if he were giving the number explicitly, you wouldn't need any wisdom to calculate it. He is saying that the number of the beast is large, unknown and unspecified, but if you have wisdom or insight you might be able to figure out what it is.
Supporting this general idea, numerologists like to point out that any of our common numbers (telephone, license plate, credit cards, tax ID numbers, etc.) would have appeared very large to someone living 2000 years ago. Indeed, they are too large to represent in the ancient number systems, so it would have been impossible to know or to specify such numbers! A very great wisdom would have been required to calculate one.
The other possible interpretation, namely that the answer actually is 666 but that you have to discover what calculation will yield that answer, is the one that has drawn the most attention. An incredible variety of attempted calculations, connections, interpretations, hidden meanings, etc. have been found for the number 666, and a fair number for 616 as well.
A contemporary (current at the time of the writing of Revelation) numerological system is Gematria, a Hebrew practice of finding otherwise-hidden meanings and connections in Bible passages by assigning numbers to names, words, etc. The Hebrew alphabet has 22 letters, and there are many different systems for assigning numbers to the letters for Gematria purposes. There is also one numbering system used for everyday purposes (as when recording amounts of money). Using that systen, here is an example:

Saddam = Samekh, Aleph, Daleth, Aleph, Mem(final) = 60 + 1 + 4 + 1 + 600 = 666
Hussein = Heh, Vau, Shin, Shin, Heh, Nun = 5 + 6 + 300 + 300 + 5 + 50 = 666
The name "Saddam Hussein" has been spelled as it would be in Hebrew and the value of the letters are added to get the sums. The second line is sort of cheating, because the Nun is final and its value should really be 700, not 50. Such "cheating" is widespread in numerology particularly when a connection to 666 is being shown, and the numerologist always finds a reason to justify bending the rules.
Gematria has been adapted to English by assigning values to the English Roman alphabet the same way as in Hebrew and interpreting English names. The assignment is usually something like this:

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Some examples:

FOX = 6 + 60 + 600 = 666
GUTENBERG = 7 + 300 + 200 + 5 + 50 + 2 + 5 + 90 + 7 = 666
NEWARK = 50 + 5 + 500 + 1 + 90 + 20 = 666
Naturally, our high-tech age has given numerologists plenty of new ways to compute these sums. Computers give each letter, digit and symbol a number according to the ASCII code. For example, "MS-DOS 6.21" = 77 + 83 + 45 + 68 + 79 + 83 + 32 + 54 + 46 + 50 + 49 = 666.
Simpler techniques have been used as well, such as counting the number of letters in each word: "Ronald Wilson Reagan" (6 letters each) = 6 6 6.
Many numerologists like to prove things based on more pure-mathematical properties (that is, not depending on words or alphabets). For example, if you take 6667 = 58,119,196,856,185,328,256 and add the digits in groups of 3, the total is 1998. The same is true for a few other powers of 666. This is used as part of an elaborate and somewhat illucid discussion on a web page entitled "Proof that the world will end in 1998". It's a shame it's no longer on the web, as it featured lots of really amusing detail, such as poetry allegedly translated from Aramaic but which rhymes in English.
As it happens, all powers of 666 (starting with 6662) are multiples of 999, and therefore, because of the casting out 9's property applied to 999, all sums of 3-digit groups of powers of 666 will be multiples of 999. Thus, it's not too surprising that a few powers of 666 all have the same 3-digit-group sums; the same thing happens for powers of 333 and 999 for the same reasons.
The claim that 39 is uninteresting goaded one numerologist into showing that 39 is related to 666 in the following way:

392 = 1521
152 + 212 = 666
Now for the more genuinely mathematical properties of 666:
666 is the sum of the squares of the first 7 primes: 22 + 32 + 52 + 72 + 112 + 132 + 172.
Another similar sum: 666 = 13 + 23 + 33 + 43 + 53 + 63 + 53 + 43 + 33 + 23 + 13. Such sums could be called "hyper-octahedral" numbers, based on a 4-dimensional polyhedron analagous to the octahedron. Perhaps when Christian numerologists go to heaven, instead of a one-mile cube, their new Jerusalem will be a 6-mile hyperoctahedron.
It is the 36th triangular number: 1+2+3+...+36 = 666, which seems more significant because 36=6×6. 666 is the largest triangular number that is a "repdigit" (all digits the same).
666 = 36-26+16.
phi(666), the number of integers less than and relatively prime to 666, is 6×6×6 = 216.
If you take the prime factors of 666 = 2×3×3×37 and add their digits, you get 18 = 6+6+6. That's not too special -- it's true for 49 of the first 1000 integers.

INE APO TIN SELIDA.... http://www.greenhodge.net/g/read/math/numbers-4.shtml

http://www.fora.gr/apokalypsis/

EDO ENAS SISXETISMOS TIS APOKALISPSIS KE TIS GENISIS.

http://www.christianity.gr/apokalypsis/

EDO: Η ΑΠΟΚΑΛΥΨΗ ΤΟΥ ΙΩΑΝΝΗ ΚΑΙ ΤΟ ΣΚΑΝΔΑΛΟ ΤΟΥ 666,AUTO INE ENA VIVLIO,AN 8ELIS FILE !PAN! RIXE MIA MATIA.
http://www.plato.elea.gr/~nbook/neweds/000001/103935.htm

http://www.astro.gr/666_1.htm

me sevasmo

AGAPA GIA NA MIN MISIS.

Εγώ λέω μόνο να αναρωτηθείτε ποίος θα είχε πραγματικό όφελος να δυναμιτίσει την
ανοησία με την εμφάνιση του 666…

Η ανώτερη πνευματική λειτουργία του ανθρώπου. Κέντρο της είναι ο εγκέφαλος, γι' αυτό λέμε ότι νόηση είναι η ικανότητα του ανθρώπινου μυαλού να συμπληρώνει τις έννοιες των διάφορων παραστάσεων που του δίνουν οι αισθήσεις, τους συλλογισμούς και τις κρίσεις, καταλήγοντας έτσι στη γνώση της πραγματικότητας, δηλ. ο άνθρωπος από μικρός και σ' όλη του τη ζωή βλέπει τα διάφορα αντικείμενα που τον τριγυρίζουν: ανθρώπους, ζώα σπίτια, δέντρα κ.ά. και σχηματίζει κάθε φορά τις παραστάσεις τους, που αντιλαμβάνεται ότι κάθε φορά είναι και διαφορετικές.
Όλ' αυτά συγκεντρώνονται στον εγκέφαλο και σχηματίζουν, με τη βοήθεια της νόησης, τη συνείδηση του ανθρώπου. Η νόηση κάνει τον άνθρωπο να ξεχωρίζει απ' τα ζώα και στηρίζεται σε ορισμένες αρχές: Στην αρχή της ταυτότητας (είναι) και στην αρχή της αιτιότητας (κάθε φαινόμενο έχει την αιτία του), κάθε αλλαγή οφείλεται σε άλλη προηγούμενη. Ορισμένοι φιλόσοφοι λένε ότι η νόηση είναι η ικανότητα του ανθρώπου να καταλαβαίνει διάφορες μεταφυσικές ιδέες (ιδέα περί Θεού, ψυχής κ.ά.).
Το παρά πάνω είναι απόκομμα από ηλεκτρονικό εγκυκλοπαιδικό πολυλεξικό ονόματι MAGENTA το οποίο εντελώς απροσδόκητα ομολογώ ότι με υπερκαλύπτει ως προς την ετοιμολογία της λέξης νόηση. Διαβάστε το ξανά και ξανά γιατί η νόηση είναι το αντίθετο της ανοησίας…

Πραγματικά αναρωτιόμουνα για αυτόν το Κέλσο, αλλά όταν ξανακοίταξα
το όνομα κατάλαβα ότι υπάρχουν για αυτόν μόνο δύο ενδεχόμενα η είναι
βλάκας μέχρι που δεν πάει ή είναι βαλτός να σπείρει την ανοησία.

Παρε τον κατηφορο της χλαμυδας λοιπον και του εκλυτου βιου αφου αυτο σε συμφερει καλυτερα!

Μεχρι εκει μπορει να φτασει ο εγκεφαλος σου μια και το πνευμα σου δεν εχεις ανακαλυψει ακομη οτι υπαρχει!